You can use your favorite social network to register or link an existing account:
Or use your email address to register without a social network:
Sign in with these social networks:
Or enter your username and password
Forgot your password?
Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.
No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.
Last year, Adobe became a pioneer in offering software subscriptions by unveiling Creative Cloud, their subscription-only software service. Yesterday, they took the next step by announcing plans to discontinue development of their Creative Suite or other CS products. Focusing all future effort on Creative Cloud, Adobe will no longer offer its classic, packaged software product in this category.
Industry reaction is mixed. Some pundits point to this as the future, others explore challenges, and a few wonder if Office is next.
Like Adobe, we think subscription software-as-a-service is the future. The benefits to consumers are huge. Subscribers are always up-to-date. They get the latest and most complete applications. They can use subscriptions across the multitude of devices people use today. Web services like SkyDrive and applications like Skype are also more easily integrated with subscription services, like the new Office 365 Home Premium.
However, unlike Adobe, we think people's shift from packaged software to subscription services will take time. Within a decade, we think everyone will choose to subscribe because the benefits are undeniable. In the meantime, we are committed to offering choice--premier software sold as a package and powerful services sold as a subscription.
As proof of this point, since the launch of Office 365 Home Premium and Office 365 University in January, more than a quarter of consumers buying Office have chosen the subscription. This exceeded our expectations, given that software subscriptions are relatively new to most consumers. So, perhaps the shift is happening faster than we originally thought, and Adobe is helping blaze the trail. Tell us @Office or in the comments what you think. Software subscriptions: #progressive or #premature?
I will not subscribe. As everyone state's here, the cost factors are just guaranteed income for the developers. I used MS Office 2003 as long I could. Was forced to upgrade when Microsoft quit supporting, and upgraded to the newest version, at the time 2010.
The subscriptions will upgrade you to the newest version, even if you are happy with the one you have. You will be forced to do the work that you are paying for. In other words, you will debug the software for Microsoft, while you pay for it. We do this now, except after a while the patches finally give you a stable version that you can use. With the subscription service, you get that working version, then they hit you with a so called upgrade and down the tubes it goes.
The developers are loving this new retail model for it's guaranteed income stream. As I read from other post's, we will see less innovation, more bugs and less of our money. That is guaranteed, so why would I want to pay a monthly service for such so-called benefits?
I'm sorry for this additional post, but I forgot a few minor points. After re-reading some of the post's here, I felt I should point out a few things that a few people don't realize.
First off, when you are at the local office supply store and you feel like your are buying Office or Adobe products, I hate to inform you but you aren't. if you go over the software user agreement, you will find that you are not the owner of said software. By paying the big bucks, you are given the right to use it. Therefore, if Microsoft decides to do an upgrade, or change features, you really have no choice but not to upgrade for now. But you endanger everyone else when you don't upgrade. Security updates help protect everyone by keeping the infection from getting a foothold in the community. Those that don't do the upgrade allow the virus to spread, and in some cases, mutate.
My second point is that once the subscription service begins, you will not be able to keep your older version very long. The support for it will be gone, and they will make changes so that your version is not compatible with the newer software. Therefore, if you wanted to interface with the outside world, forget it. Do you think Microsoft would allow you to keep using an older version when they can force you into the better, faster, quicker version? Any one notice, that over the years computers keep getting faster, but Microsoft at best keeps pace.
"we think people's shift from packaged software to subscription services will take time."
You chaps are just getting better and better in the eyes of the salt o' the earth!
Microsoft once had the appearance of the crusty monarch, now good wisdom and solid proof that MS understands the hearts of their end users is getting out.
It WILL take a while for us to catch up with the future that's been prophesied. I remember years ago Mr Gates said the tablet was going to be the way of the future, it seemed far fetched.
I think Star Trek did it before Gates mentioned it. That is the use of tablets. Star Trek has been using them for a while, and Bill Gates saw this a talked about it. In my opinion, when the State Department found Microsoft guilty of business practices, they should of put him in prison instead of the measly fine they handed him. His monopolistic business practices stymied computer technology and destroyed many a software company. Anyone remember Netscape?
The state dept. had emails from Mr Gates, where he told certain companies, Compaq being one, that if they produced the products they were working on they wouldn't get access to Windows or DOS. Since all involved had businesses that were built around that software, they had no choice but to shelf those products. Those products were faster computers with more capabilities like voice control. Here we are like 20 some years later, and still no voice control in any real sense of the word. Thanks to Gates, we are still typing away. Thanks to Google, we are finally seeing voice control work. Thanks Google.
Come on Clint, really? You are going to compare home & auto leasing to software leasing. Most , if not all users don't want a constant barrage of new features. I decide what I want it to do, then I go and buy what does the job at the least cost. At this point I should be happy, but we all know I'm not. I have to keep getting updates from Microsoft, since the software is so buggy with security leaks and what have you. But after a while, those updates have made my package pretty stable, at least enough so that I decide I want to stay with it. But in leasing, I get upgraded monthly, which means I will need updates on a daily basis, just to keep it running.
With a lease, the software is upgraded even if I don't want it. I already have what I need, I don't want it to change or for it to be upgraded. With leasing, I quit paying, then I can view and print my documents. No editing or creation of new documents. Now I can buy, and stay with that package. That is until Microsoft decides it needs more money and makes my package no longer compatible.
I will go as long as I can without upgrading. When MS forces us to sign into the leasing package, I'll be using freeware. I'm already doing so with some packages right now. Been buying the Office Pro now for I can't remember how long. Have 2010 now, and that will probably be my last purchase of an Office product. There is no way I'm signing into getting my gas tank filled automatically. I'll be signing up for the greenware, or as we call it, free/shareware. Not my choice Microsoft, it's your's.
i just wanted to add a couple of additional thoughts here.
1) i think a bunch of folk are assuming that subscription means "in the Cloud only" which i am certainly not expecting. with the current subscription models you can still install locally, and i would not expect this to go away anytime soon.
2) subscription is a great commercial model for both vendors (Microsoft) and consumers (the rest of us) we pay for what we use (i don't buy 1,000,000 gallons of gas store it and then hope to use it, i pay for what i need/use) and yes, we can take a sceptic view about paying for "bug fixes" etc. but alongside fixes we get improvements, they're hand in hand and always have been. it's the nature of software.
Today, Surf Air, the world's first subscription airline , launched in San Francisco. The new airline