<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.office.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Customer feedback to improve product design</title><link>http://blogs.office.com/b/microsoft-access/archive/2008/08/15/customer-feedback-to-improve-product-design.aspx</link><description>Access 2007 in many ways is a different product for end users. In previous releases it was very difficult to be successful creating a new application without using help, taking a class, reading a book, or asking the community—information workers that</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 1.5.134.15456 (Build: 5.5.134.15456)</generator><item><title>re: Customer feedback to improve product design</title><link>http://blogs.office.com/b/microsoft-access/archive/2008/08/15/customer-feedback-to-improve-product-design.aspx#16461</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:36:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">53587256-c606-4c9b-bad4-97c86b12ce62:16461</guid><dc:creator>erwin leyes</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;if this is the way ms access team develops software then, I am hoping ms access internal development will become an open source project someday. And I am hoping Visual foxrpo too. We developers can foresee the reality esp in datacentric applications that if they will furnished ms access then, VS.net will end up somewhere. So, politics is the game here. Fellow MS Access Developer lets continue to do a positive criticism to the ms access team. As-Salamu Alaykum!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.office.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=16461" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Customer feedback to improve product design</title><link>http://blogs.office.com/b/microsoft-access/archive/2008/08/15/customer-feedback-to-improve-product-design.aspx#16462</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:17:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">53587256-c606-4c9b-bad4-97c86b12ce62:16462</guid><dc:creator>Gunnar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve been using Access since Access 97. I develop applikations that we use internally at the Research Institute where I work. Now I use Access 2003 and have done some small testing with Access 2007. I understand your intentions making Access more easy to use for unexperienced users. But while you&amp;#39;ve done this you also made it more difficult for proffesional developers. I agree strongly with&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;What would be good is an &amp;quot;Access 97&amp;quot; setting in Options to switch it all off including AutoCorrect and Subdatasheets etc etc.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.office.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=16462" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Customer feedback to improve product design</title><link>http://blogs.office.com/b/microsoft-access/archive/2008/08/15/customer-feedback-to-improve-product-design.aspx#16463</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:00:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">53587256-c606-4c9b-bad4-97c86b12ce62:16463</guid><dc:creator>Vladimir Cvajniga</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Craig: &amp;quot;What would be good is an &amp;quot;Access 97&amp;quot; setting in Options to switch it all off including AutoCorrect and Subdatasheets etc etc.&amp;quot; I second that!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.office.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=16463" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Customer feedback to improve product design</title><link>http://blogs.office.com/b/microsoft-access/archive/2008/08/15/customer-feedback-to-improve-product-design.aspx#16464</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 06:16:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">53587256-c606-4c9b-bad4-97c86b12ce62:16464</guid><dc:creator>Gilad</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This post is about Customer feedback. I can’t resist but to return the ball to the Access team’s end, by saying that I think you would be wise to practice what you preach. There was another post such as this way back that dealt with confrontations and the recommended ways to deal with them. I was tempted then, as I sometimes am, when such general strategy issues come up, to use the post to try and convince members of the team to use their own recommendations to others, and actually demonstrate the conduct they recommend. This blog does enable communication with the Access customers, and I think it is wonderful, but it does not necessarily mean that the Access team is also responsive to its customers. It may just be a way to allow the developers to vent their frustrations, without really taking them into serious consideration. For example, I can’t believe that the added ribbons in Access07 were based on any listening to any Access customers, developers or end users alike. I know the Office team listened a lot to customers when developing the ribbons, and then ribbons were introduced to the Office user-interface. So if they were made to be part of the Access user interface that would have made more sense to me. But they weren’t. Instead the developers are now required to add ribbons to the interface of the applications they develop, which is a whole different matter. The reasons developers don’t like ribbons has been discussed here. I think the reasons end users will not use them is even more salient. I assume the Access team has many considerations that I can not be aware of, and there must be a lot more reasoning behind their decisions that I can not know about. But from my limited perspective, this looks and seems like just an example of pretending to listen to customers, but in fact not sufficiently doing so. I hope I don&amp;#39;t sound to harsh. I do think Access is great.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gilad&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.office.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=16464" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Customer feedback to improve product design</title><link>http://blogs.office.com/b/microsoft-access/archive/2008/08/15/customer-feedback-to-improve-product-design.aspx#16465</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:10:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">53587256-c606-4c9b-bad4-97c86b12ce62:16465</guid><dc:creator>Craig Alexander Morrison</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Clint &amp;quot;we referred the Access 2003 boot screen as the gray screen of death.&amp;quot; If only I could get Access 2003 to look as good as Access 97 at startup I would be happy. That is no getting started at all. How about making the getting started, ribbons and navigation all things we can switch off so that Access 2009 will look and work just like Access 97 as far as the UI is concerned. You got it right and it is a shame that all &amp;quot;progress&amp;quot; since has been frivolous. As stated so many times by many before just make these new things that developers do not want or need OPTIONAL. Not so much a &amp;quot;gray screen of death&amp;quot; more of a blank sheet of paper. Just because many developers hate the above new UI clutter does not mean it may have some no use to the &amp;quot;Sunday Drivers&amp;quot; but make it all OPTIONAL rather than force us to wade through this detritus. What would be good is an &amp;quot;Access 97&amp;quot; setting in Options to switch it all off including AutoCorrect and Subdatasheets etc etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.office.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=16465" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Customer feedback to improve product design</title><link>http://blogs.office.com/b/microsoft-access/archive/2008/08/15/customer-feedback-to-improve-product-design.aspx#16466</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:25:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">53587256-c606-4c9b-bad4-97c86b12ce62:16466</guid><dc:creator>Vladimir Cvajniga</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Erwin: Thank you very much for your support. :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.office.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=16466" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Customer feedback to improve product design</title><link>http://blogs.office.com/b/microsoft-access/archive/2008/08/15/customer-feedback-to-improve-product-design.aspx#16467</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:36:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">53587256-c606-4c9b-bad4-97c86b12ce62:16467</guid><dc:creator>Erwin Leyes</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Make the distribution of ms access even like rbase or Visual Foxpro.The Ribbon customization like menu bar in VS 2008 and datasheet/datagrid like DevExperience-Developer Express. It&amp;#39;s a dream for all the ms access developers. Why the Developer Express team can create such an incredible enhancements? MS has a very Fat budget compared to them. Vladimir, thanks four your continuous positive feedback. Someday the Ms Access team will make or break!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.office.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=16467" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Customer feedback to improve product design</title><link>http://blogs.office.com/b/microsoft-access/archive/2008/08/15/customer-feedback-to-improve-product-design.aspx#16468</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 00:08:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">53587256-c606-4c9b-bad4-97c86b12ce62:16468</guid><dc:creator>Vladimir Cvajniga</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Will there be a &amp;quot;customer-feedback-call&amp;quot; for navigation &amp;quot;pain&amp;quot; &amp;amp; ribbon &amp;amp; help &amp;amp; missing classic UI with toolbars &amp;amp; missing database window? Please...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.office.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=16468" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Customer feedback to improve product design</title><link>http://blogs.office.com/b/microsoft-access/archive/2008/08/15/customer-feedback-to-improve-product-design.aspx#16469</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:35:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">53587256-c606-4c9b-bad4-97c86b12ce62:16469</guid><dc:creator>Vladimir Cvajniga</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have rated CZ template called Úkoly. But as far as I can see low ratings do not count... :-/&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.office.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=16469" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Customer feedback to improve product design</title><link>http://blogs.office.com/b/microsoft-access/archive/2008/08/15/customer-feedback-to-improve-product-design.aspx#16470</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:12:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">53587256-c606-4c9b-bad4-97c86b12ce62:16470</guid><dc:creator>Vladimir Cvajniga</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;1) Why not make maïn screen items optional? Experienced users don&amp;#39;t need a screen with links to templates. 2) Ergonomy: &amp;quot;Blank database&amp;quot; icon is far away from lower right corner where we input database name. I&amp;#39;d expect the input box just under the &amp;quot;Blank database&amp;quot; icon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.office.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=16470" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>